Accident And Injury Attorneys


Abogados De Accidentes

Long Island Negligent Security Lawyer

Law Office of Cohen & Jaffe, LLP.

There is an area of law under the general category of “Premises Liability Law” known as “Negligent Security Law.” The term “negligent security” describes a situation where you become the victim of a violent, criminal attack, such as an assault, shooting, rape or robbery, while on someone else’s property. These claims usually come up in the context of a customer being followed to their car in a shopping center and mugged before they can get in their car; a person being robbed or shot while removing money from an ATM machine; an assault inside a hotel room, or a robbery at a gas station while you are standing next to your car, filling up with gas; or an assault in the lobby of an apartment complex. The law imposes a duty on these commercial establishments to maintain their property in a reasonably safe condition.

That includes the obligation to be aware of what is going on around them in the community. If robberies, shootings, and/or other violent criminal activity have been going on within a reasonably close distance to the location where your incident occurred, the property owner has a duty to do something about it to protect you. For example, if a shopping center is constantly the subject of parking lot robberies, the shopping center has a duty to add more security guards, put up more video surveillance, add more lighting, eliminate some entrances and exits or to take other action that other shopping centers would or should take to protect against crime. If one shopping center is in an area that is targeted by criminals more than others, there may be a higher duty for that shopping center to provide much more security for its customers then the shopping center across town, where little criminal activity occurs.

I have seen many violent criminals go to jail for many years. This, unfortunately, does not help the victim’s financial situation when they are left with thousands of dollars of medical bills, permanent injuries and the loss of ability to earn money in the future.

If a property owner fails to take care of their property and you are hurt because of it, they are liable and you have the right to hold them responsible. Some examples of questions I look for answers to after someone becomes a victim of a violent crime on someone else’s property include:

  • Was there any evidence of prior violent criminal activity at or near the area of the crime?
  • Was there adequate lighting where the crime occurred?
  • Was there any private security hired in areas where there may be a high crime rate?
  • Were there functioning locks on doors?
  • Was there a satisfactory alarm system or surveillance system in place?

Negligent security lawsuits are asserted by individuals who are attacked or victimized on someone else’s property. Premises liability law controls negligent security claims because they arise from the ownership or control of property or “premises.” Under premises liability law, a property owner or the party responsible for maintaining the property may be held liable for the injuries of another if the injuries were the result of a dangerous condition on the property. While there are several circumstances that create unsafe conditions, negligent security law traditionally has addressed those unsafe conditions created by third-party attacks, i.e., assailants.

If you were injured in an attack by a third party assailant on someone else’s premises, you should consult an experienced negligent security attorney as soon as possible about your available legal remedies.

Negligent Security Image

Premises Liability Rules and Negligent Security Claims

In most states, premises liability law places a duty on individuals or organizations that own or are in control of land or buildings to maintain their property in a safe condition and to warn people of any known or reasonably discovered hazards. To recover damages in a premises liability case, the injured party must prove that a dangerous condition existed on the property; the owner or possessor knew or should have known of the condition; the owner or possessor failed to take reasonable steps to eliminate or reduce the danger; and this failure was the proximate cause of the injury. A dangerous condition exists when something on the property presents an unreasonable risk to people on the property that may not be obvious to them.

Landowner Duty in Negligent Security Cases

Landowners have no general duty to protect people on their property from third-party attacks. Consequently, an injured person may only recover damages for injuries caused by attacks on another’s property if the landowner owed a special legal duty to them. Advertising claims, contractual provisions, state laws, city ordinances or the relationship of the injured person to the property owner may all serve to create the necessary duty. For example, if the injured person is invited onto the property as a social guest or for business reasons, many states impose a duty of care on property owners to take reasonable steps to protect invitees from known or reasonably known dangers on the property. Knowledge of prior crimes on the property or in the neighborhood may create a duty to warn of the risks of attack as well. If the possibility of criminal attack was foreseeable, most states impose a duty on property owners to take reasonable precautions to protect people on the premises from attack.

Foreseeability of Criminal Attacks

In the law, something is foreseeable if its occurrence can or should be reasonably anticipated, or if a person of ordinary cautiousness would expect it to occur or exist under the circumstances. Different states use different standards to answer the question of whether or not a criminal attack was foreseeable in negligent security cases. Generally, most states use some combination of the following factors to determine foreseeability:

  • Imminent harm: Foreseeability determined by evidence that the property owner knew or should have known a particular crime was imminent based on prior incidences of the crime in the area or on the property
  • Prior similar incidences: Foreseeability determined by evidence of comparable criminal acts during a specific time frame on or near the property
  • Totality of the circumstances: Foreseeability determined by the location, condition and layout of the premises, and other relevant factors, including any prior criminal activity on or near the premises

Regardless of the approach, when an attack is deemed to have been foreseeable, courts will find that the property owner had a duty to use reasonable measures to protect people on the premises from third-party assaults. Reasonable security measures may include hiring a qualified and reliable security service, installing security systems and actively monitoring security cameras, creating a security plan, having working door locks, installing a buzzer/intercom system, developing building access control measures, having one-use hotel room key cards or installing ATM panic buttons.

Balancing Test

Most courts use a balancing test to determine whether certain security measures should have been taken by the property owner. The test weights the likelihood of an attack and the potential for harm against the burden imposed on the property owner to prevent the incident with security measures. For example, in cases where there has been crime resulting in injury on or near the property and the costs of securing the property are low, the court is likely to find against the property owner.

Common Defenses

While the availability of particular defenses varies by state, some of the common defenses asserted by property owners include:

  • Absence of duty: the property owner did not owe a duty to the injured person
  • Adequate security: the landowner provided reasonable security despite the occurrence of the attack
  • Contributory negligence: while the landowner may share some of the responsibility for the attack, the plaintiff is partially responsible for the attack by failing to exercise reasonable care and/or assuming the risk
  • Apportion fault: property owners will attribute some or all of the fault for the injury to the intentional criminal conduct of the assailant
  • No available security measures: property owners may use criminal profiling to argue that there were no available security measures capable of deterring this particular type of criminal

In order to counter these defenses, an individual injured by an attack on someone else’s property should seek the assistance of a skilled personal injury attorney.

Inadequate Hotel Security

A security failure in a hotel, motel, inn or resort can have very serious consequences for guests. Innocent people are sometimes injured as a result of criminal acts that could have been prevented with adequate security. When this occurs, injured victims may be entitled to pursue compensation from the facility’s owner or other responsible parties.

Hotel guests, workers and visitors have a right to expect to be protected by reasonable security measures provided by the owners and managers. When those security measures are inadequate, criminals can cause injuries through gunshots, knife wounds, beatings, rape and other assaults. In the worst cases, criminal assault can result in fatalities.

If you were injured in an attack by a third-party assailant at a hotel, you should consult an experienced negligent security attorney as soon as possible about your potential legal remedies for your premises liability case. At Law Office of Cohen & Jaffe, LLP our experienced Long Island personal injury lawyers can evaluate your case and determine who may be held legally liable for your injuries.

Hotel Owners or Managers may be Held Liable for Damages

Hotel owners may be liable for injuries that could have been prevented if adequate security had been provided. In some cases, hotel owners are more concerned with their bottom line than with the security of the people on their premises. Although criminals who commit assault are responsible for their crimes, property owners may have civil responsibility for injuries that occur because of negligent security that allows their guests, workers and visitors to fall victim to crime.

If you have been injured because of a criminal act committed in a hotel with inadequate security, your best course of action is to consult with a knowledgeable Long Island personal injury lawyer as soon as possible. The sooner your attorney can begin collecting evidence in your case, the better. Among other things, evidence may include hotel security camera tapes, 911 call recordings, witness statements and police reports.

A claim for injuries suffered because of criminal acts that could have been prevented with adequate hotel security is a type of premises liability claim. Hotel owners, managers and other responsible parties have a duty to take reasonable measures to provide security for their guests and others on the premises.

Generally, in order to prove a premises liability claim, it must be established: 1) that the injured party was on the premises lawfully (or, if not lawfully present, that the owner knew of the injured party’s presence and allowed it); 2) that an unsafe condition existed for which the property owner was negligent because the owner knew or should have known about the condition and failed to remedy it or to give warning; and 3) that the injuries suffered by the victim were caused by the property owner’s negligence.

Foreseeability is a key factor in negligent security claims. In every type of business that has business invitees – such as hotels, bars, shopping malls and retail stores – property owners have a duty to exercise reasonable care to protect people lawfully on their premises from criminal conduct that can be reasonably foreseen. For example, if a hotel is located in a known high-crime area, it may be reasonably foreseeable that criminals could target hotel guests. If so, the owners of the hotel may have a duty to take security measures, such as hiring guards, installing locks, using video surveillance and other steps.

No two premises liability claims are alike. Our experienced personal injury attorneys will evaluate the merits of your case and determine what parties may be liable for your injuries. Our firm is selective about the cases we accept, but if we take your case, you can have confidence that we will aggressively pursue the maximum compensation you are entitled to receive.

Damages Recoverable in Inadequate Hotel Security Claims

If you have been the victim of a crime that occurred on a hotel’s premises and suffered serious injuries as a result, you may be entitled to file a premises liability claim against the hotel’s owner, manager or other responsible party. Damages vary from case to case and depend on the severity and duration of the injuries. The greater your injuries, the greater the compensation you may be entitled to receive.

Depending on the circumstances in your particular case, damages may include:

  • Medical expenses.
  • Lost wages.
  • Pain and suffering.
  • Mental anguish.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life.

Inadequate Apartment Security

When injuries occur through criminal acts in an apartment building or complex because the property owner failed to provide adequate security, the injured party may have a claim against the negligent property owner, landlord or other responsible party.

Criminal assault cases often result from broken locks on gates or doors, failure of security guards to act, lack of surveillance or lack of response to protect victims during a crime in progress. Resulting injuries may include gunshot or knife wounds, physical blows, rape or even death.

Property owners have a duty to take reasonable measures to protect the safety of tenants and visitors. If they are negligent in that duty and serious injury results, the injured victim may have a premises liability claim. Premises liability involves more than just slip-and-fall accidents. It applies to any unreasonably dangerous condition that results in injury to someone who is lawfully on the property, provided the property owner’s negligence contributed to the injury.

At Law Office of Cohen & Jaffe, LLP our experienced Long Island personal injury lawyer can evaluate your case and determine who may be held legally liable for your injuries. Our firm is selective in the cases we take, but you can rest assured that if we accept your case, we will fight aggressively for the maximum damages you are entitled to receive.

Premises Liability Claims for Inadequate Apartment Security

The basis for premises liability claims for inadequate security is the concept that property owners and managers have a duty to protect people on the property through reasonable security measures. When property owners cut costs by providing inadequate security, tenants and visitors who become victims of crime as a result may be entitled to compensation for their losses.

If you have been injured in a criminal act that was allowed to occur because of inadequate apartment security, it is important to act quickly and consult with an experienced personal injury attorney. Time is of the essence because your lawyer will need to collect evidence to support your case as soon as possible after the incident occurred. Additionally, there is a statute of limitations (time limit) for filing premises liability claims in New York.

Proving Claims for Inadequate Apartment Security

Injured parties must prove certain things in order to recover damages in premises liability cases. In the state of New York, you must show:

  • That you were lawfully on the premises. If you were not lawfully present, you must prove that the owner of the property knew you were trespassing and allowed it.
  • That an unsafe condition existed for which the property owner was negligent. This means that the owner knew about the unsafe condition, or should have known, and failed to fix it or give adequate warning.
  • That your injuries were caused by the negligence of the property owner.

Private and public property owners, as well as municipalities, are responsible for maintaining reasonable safety standards and may be held accountable for injuries that result from their failure to do so.

Damages in Negligent Apartment Security Claims

If you have been the victim of a crime and suffered injuries because of negligent apartment security, you may be entitled to pursue compensation for your losses. The amount of damages recoverable will depend on the extent of the injuries you have sustained.

For example, you may be entitled to compensation for:

  • Doctor’s bills.
  • Hospital bills.
  • Prescription medications.
  • Physical therapy.
  • Lost wages.
  • Pain and suffering.
  • Mental anguish.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life.
  • Other damages.


If you have been injured by an attack on someone else’s property, contact an attorney with experience in premises liability cases as soon as possible so as not to miss any filing deadlines. An experienced lawyer can evaluate your negligent security claim and help you prepare your case.

For questions about this article or any aspect of personal injury, please feel free to contact me directly or call 866-878-6774.

Get Answers Now

Fill out the form below and we will contact you immediately.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Obtenga Respuestas Ahora

Complete el siguiente formulario y nos comunicaremos con usted de inmediato.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Skip to content